Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 6.6% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.3% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — 7.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 9.0% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 7.6% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 2.7% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 15.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 17.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 14.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 20.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 13.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 6.2% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 17.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDIA ANATA HUBIAK EXECUTIVE DI 6.6% of Rev
EMILY GREENBERG Board President —
CHRISTINA TRUSTY ROSS Board President —
STACY GILBERT Treasurer —
BRITTANY CERES Board Member —
BRANDON LUNDELL Board Member —
VERONICA LEMBERGER Board Member —
ALYAH BAKER Board Member —
VIVIAN KIM Board Member —
CHRISTINA JOHNSON Board Member —
STEPHEN BAUMANN Board Member —
BARB PASSALACQUA Board Member —
HEATHER KARIMI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDIA ANATA HUBIAK EXECUTIVE DI 6.3% of Rev
KATHLEEN ALT Board President —
RACHAEL HARP Board President —
EMILY GREENBERG Secretary —
STACY GILBERT Treasurer —
MARK RAGAN Board Member —
LEAH ALEXIS Board Member —
IVAN LOPEZ Board Member —
JESSE MARKS Board Member —
ADRIANA LLEWELYNN Board Member —
BRITTANY CERES Board Member —
AMY BRITTON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDIA ANATA HUBIAK EXECUTIVE DI 5.9% of Rev
CLAUDIA ANATA HUBIAK EXECUTIVE DI 1.9% of Rev
CLAUDIA ANATA HUBIAK EXECUTIVE DI 1.9% of Rev
KYLIE CRANDALL Board Member —
RACHAEL HARP Board Member —
ADRIANA LLEWELYNN Board Member —
MARK RAGAN Board Member —
KATHLEEN ALT Board President —
LEAH ALEXIS Board President —
EMILY GREENBERG Secretary —
STACY GILBERT Treasurer —
AMY BRITTON Board Member —
BRITTANY CERES Board Member —
KYLIE CRANDALL Board Member —
RACHAEL HARP Board Member —
ADRIANA LLEWELYNN Board Member —
JESSE MARKS Board Member —
MARK RAGAN Board Member —
KATHLEEN ALT Board President —
LEAH ALEXIS Board President —
STACY GILBERT Treasurer —
EMILY GREENBERG Secretary —
AMY BRITTON Board Member —
KATHLEEN ALT Board President —
BRITTANY CERES Board Member —
LEAH ALEXIS Board President —
KYLIE CRANDALL Board Member —
STACY GILBERT Treasurer —
RACHAEL HARP Board Member —
EMILY GREENBERG Secretary —
ADRIANA LLEWELYNN Board Member —
AMY BRITTON Board Member —
MARK RAGAN Board Member —
BRITTANY CERES Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 270 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points below the peer median (15 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.