Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
45
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 8.8% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — 5.1% 63 Stable Stable Watch
2019 — — — 68 Stable Stable Watch
2018 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tiffany Dinsmore Artistic Director 6.9% of Rev
Mary Jo Johnson Board Member 1.7% of Rev
Frank Thompson Board Member 1.4% of Rev
Ella Riley Board Member 1.3% of Rev
Cindy Binnicker Secretary 0.6% of Rev
Abigail Mathias Board Member 0.4% of Rev
Chris Whitehead Board Member 0.2% of Rev
Audrey Johnson Board Member 0.0% of Rev
Leonard Lesslie Treasurer 0.0% of Rev
Lou Clyde Board Member —
Greg Gerrald Board Member —
Gerrard Goines Board Member —
Joan Marco Board Member —
Kelsey McGarrigan Board Member —
Tyler Zangla Board Member —
Jim DeFelice Executive Director —
Linda DuRant Board President —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tiffany Dinsmore Artistic Director 5.5% of Rev
McCall Betherum Board Member 1.1% of Rev
Ella Riley Board Member 0.9% of Rev
Mary Jo Johnson Board Member 0.7% of Rev
Cindy Binnicker Secretary 0.6% of Rev
Gerrard Goines Board Member 0.1% of Rev
Manny Moitoso Board Member 0.0% of Rev
Chris Whitehead Board Member —
Abigail Mathias Board Member —
Greg Gerrald Board Member —
Lou Clyde Board Member —
Joan Marco Board Member —
Jim DeFelice Executive Director —
Leonard G Lesslie Treasurer —
Linda DuRant Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Gerrard Goings Board Member —
Tiffany Dinsmore Artistic Director —
Joan Marco Board Member —
Mary Jo Johnson Board Member —
Danny Harrington Board Member —
Lou Clyde Board Member —
Greg Gerrald Board Member —
Linda DuRant Board President —
Jim DeFelice Board President —
Leonard G Lesslie Treasurer —
Cindy Binnicker Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tiffany Dinsmore Artistic Director 2.1% of Rev
Jim DeFelice Board President —
Linda DuRant Board President —
Cindy Binnicker Secretary —
Leonard G Lesslie Treasurer —
Greg Gerald Board Member —
Lou Clyde Board Member —
Gerrard Goings Board Member —
Joan Marco Board Member —
Meesh Hays Board Member —
Kelly Tam Board Member —
Mary Jo Johnson Board Member —
Abby Tam Board Member —
Jim DeFelice Board President —
Linda DuRant Board President —
C Glenn Farr Secretary —
Leonard G Lesslie Treasurer —
Kari Beaty Board Member —
Lou Clyde Board Member —
Tiffany Dinsmore Board Member —
Jeff Riley Board Member —
Joan Marco Board Member —
Meesh Hays Board Member —
MonaLisa Botts Board Member —
Emma Bagley Board Member —
Gabriel Marchant Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 129 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.