Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
24
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 28.3% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 34.2% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 14.2% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 46.9% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 5.5% 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 9.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 6.2% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 22.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 11.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 31.6% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 21.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lawrence Edelson Artistic Director 16.2% of Rev
Kelly Kuo Artistic Director 12.1% of Rev
Stephen Weiner Board President
Katherine Moldave Secretary
Kevin Kotcher Treasurer
Gail Chesler Board Member
Ralph Craviso Board Member
Anna DeSimone Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lawrence Edelson Artistic Director 12.1% of Rev
Kelly Kuo Artistic Director 5.0% of Rev
Katherine Moldave Secretary
Gail Chesler Board Member
Ralph Craviso Board Member
Anna DeSimone Board Member
Dan Kempson Board Member
Stephen Weiner Board President
Kevin Kotcher Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lawrence Edelson Artistic Director 6.1% of Rev
Stephen Weiner Board President
Katherine Moldave Secretary
Kevin Kotcher Treasurer
Dan Kempson Board Member
Anna DeSimone Board Member
Gail Chesler Board Member
Ralph Craviso Board Member
Karen Brooks Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 40 → 24 over 5 years (declining by 16 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~13 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.