Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.7% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 4.3% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 5.3% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 4.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 3.9% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 — — 3.4% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 4.8% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 4.8% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — 5.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN FROST Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
DAN MCFEELY Board President —
JULIE ECKERT Board President —
JIM REILLY Treasurer —
JERRY NORMAN Board Member —
JILL ZANIKER Board Member —
JOE FITZGERALD Board Member —
KATHY GUIDER Board Member —
LEAH MOSLEY Board Member —
MATT BRANIC Board Member —
MUNIVER SINGH Board Member —
SAM ARCE Secretary —
JOHN M MURPHY Board President —
DEBORAH NEWMAN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES REILLY Treasurer 4.7% of Rev
DANIEL MCFEELY Board President —
MELISSA VOLZ SMITH Board President —
KELLI PRADER Secretary —
MUNIVER SINGH Treasurer —
JOHN TERRY Board Member —
DR JOSEPH FITZGERALD Board Member —
JILL ZANIKER Board Member —
CHRISTINE REPPERT Board Member —
RILEY PARR Board Member —
LEZLIE M HEATH Board Member —
KATHY GUIDER Board Member —
LEAH MOSLEY Board Member —
BRIAN FROST Board Member —
SAM ARCE Board Member —
JULIE ECKERT Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES REILLY EXEC. DIR./T 4.7% of Rev
SAM ARCE Board Member —
JULIE ECKERT Board Member —
DR JOSEPH FITZGERALD Board Member —
BRIAN FROST Board Member —
KATHY GUIDER Board Member —
LEZLIE M HEATH Board Member —
DANIEL MCFEELY Board President —
LEAH MOSLEY Board Member —
RILEY PARR Board Member —
KELLI PRADER Secretary —
CHRISTINE REPPERT Board Member —
MUNIVER SINGH Treasurer —
MELISSA VOLZ SMITH VICE PRESIDE —
JOHN TERRY Board Member —
JILL ZANIKER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM REILLY EXEC. DIR./T 4.7% of Rev
E DAVIS COOTS Board Member —
DR JOSEPH FITZGERALD Board Member —
KATHY GUIDER Board Member —
LEZLIE M HEATH Board Member —
DANIEL MCFEELY VICE PRESIDE —
RILEY PARR Board Member —
AMY PAUSEK Board Member —
KELLI PRADER Board Member —
CHRISTINE REPPERT Board Member —
MELISSA VOLZ SMITH Secretary —
JOHN TERRY Board President —
JILL ZANIKER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 181 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 54 points below the peer median (0 vs. 54).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.