Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
33
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 17.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 16.3% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 11.1% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 13.6% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 13.7% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 11.8% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 12.4% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 13.7% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 11.5% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 12.8% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 11.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2012 11.6% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 11.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUSTIN BRADY Executive Director 15.6% of Rev
ROSEMARY DORSA Board Member
JOHN FISCHER Board Member
MONICA CANTRELL Board Member
TERRI CZAJKA Board Member
MARIE MACINTOSH Board Member
MICHELE GOODRICH Board Member
ELOISA GARZA Board Member
ANDREW BALL Treasurer
JENNIFER COOPER Executive Director
BOB DEVOSS Board President
KATHLEEN HURSH Secretary
BROOKS CAREY Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAULINE MOFFAT Executive Director 14.4% of Rev
GARY REITER Board President
LORRAINE BALL Board President
MICHELE GOODRICH Secretary
ROBERT DEVOSS Treasurer
TREVOR BELDEN Board Member
BROOKS CAREY Board Member
JOHN FISCHER Board Member
ELOISA GARZA Board Member
ERIC GERSHMAN Board Member
MARIE MACKINTOSH Board Member
MEGAN NAGEL Board Member
JILL ZANIKER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in IN for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 33 over 5 years (declining by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.