Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 9.4% 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 15.0% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 16.4% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 15.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 23.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELE DE LA REZA Executive Director 5.1% of Rev
PETER KOPE Artistic Director 4.5% of Rev
ANDRES FRANCO Executive Director —
PAUL PURDY Board President —
CHRISTIE SEIBERT SMITH Board President —
VIC DOZZI Treasurer —
ANNA SHABALOV Secretary —
ELLISON BARNES Board Member —
CHEYENNE BUNTAIN Board Member —
STEPHANIE HOOGENDOORN Board Member —
MICHELE PETRUCCELLI Board Member —
DAVID SEMAN Board Member —
NATALEE SMITH Board Member —
RACHEL TONEY Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELE DE LA REZA Executive Director 5.2% of Rev
PETER KOPE Artistic Director 4.1% of Rev
CHRISTIE SEIBERT SMITH Board President —
PAUL PURDY Board President —
VIC DOZZI Treasurer —
ANNA SHABALOV Secretary —
CHEYENNE BUNTAIN Board Member —
KEVIN HORNER Board Member —
JONATHAN C IAMS Board Member —
MICHELE PETRUCCELLI Board Member —
NATALEE SMITH Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELE DE LA REZA Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
PETER KOPE Artistic Director 3.8% of Rev
REBECCA HIMBERGER Executive Director 2.7% of Rev
SEAN GRAY Board Member —
D KEVIN HORNER Board Member —
JONATHAN C IAMS Secretary —
TRACY MAHOOD Board President —
MICHELE PETRUCCELLI Board President —
MINDY ROSSI-STABLER Board Member —
ROBIN M RYAN Treasurer —
NATALEE SMITH Board Member —
ANNA SHABALOV Board Member —
CHRISTIE SEIBERT SMITH Board Member —
JENNIFER BONFILI Board Member —
CHEYENNE BUNTAIN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REBECCA HIMBERGER Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
MICHELE DE LA REZA Artistic Director 3.9% of Rev
PETER KOPE Artistic Director 3.7% of Rev
SEAN GRAY Board Member —
MONICA HERTZMAN Board President —
D KEVIN HORNER Board Member —
JONATHAN C IAMS Board Member —
TRACY MAHOOD Board President —
MICHELE PETRUCCELLI Board President —
MINDY ROSSI-STABLER Board Member —
ROBIN M RYAN Treasurer —
WILLIAM D SEMINS Board Member —
ANNA SHABALOV Board Member —
CHRISTIE SEIBERT SMITH Board Member —
STEPHEN BONTRAGER Board Member —
KENNETH SPRUILL Board Member —
NANCY SIMPRONIO Secretary —
JENNIFER BONFILI Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.