Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 4.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 14.8% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 17.6% 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 7.0% 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 6.6% 42 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 8.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 9.0% 40 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 4.8% 42 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOE MARKLEY CO-EXEC DIRE 3.5% of Rev
SHEILA MARKLEY CO-EXEC DIRE 3.5% of Rev
THERESA BRAMLAGE Board Member —
JUSTIN HOOVER Treasurer —
SALLY JARDINE VICE CHAIRPE —
BRAD JOHNSON Board Member —
MARGARET KILPATRICK Board Member —
HELEN KOVAC Secretary —
KELLY LANDES Board Member —
TIFFANY NACCARATO Board Member —
MARY DEVIN PHD Board President —
NICOLE PRINTZ VICE-CHAIRPE —
KATHY TRIPLETT Treasurer —
LISA OSBOURN FINANCIAL OF —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOE MARKLEY CO-EXEC DIRE 3.5% of Rev
SHEILA MARKLEY CO-EXEC DIRE 3.5% of Rev
THERESA BRAMLAGE Board Member —
DESIREE BROWN Board Member —
BARBARA COWEN CRAFT Board Member —
JUSTIN HOOVER Treasurer —
BRAD JOHNSON Board Member —
MARGARET KILPATRICK Board Member —
HELEN KOVAC Secretary —
KELLY LANDES Board Member —
MARY DEVIN PHD Board Member —
JANETTE VOGELSANG VICE-CHAIRPE —
FLORENCE WHITEBREAD Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOE MARKLEY CO-EXEC DIRE 3.5% of Rev
SHEILA MARKLEY CO-EXEC DIRE 3.5% of Rev
THERESA BRAMLAGE Board Member —
BARBARA CRAFT Board Member —
JUSTIN HOOVER Board Member —
BRAD JOHNSON Board Member —
MARGARET KILPATRICK Board Member —
HELEN KOVAC Secretary —
LISA OSBOURN Treasurer —
MARY DEVIN PHD Board Member —
JANETTE VOGELSANG VICE-CHAIRPE —
FLORENCE WHITEBREAD Board President —
JOHN YORK Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOE MARKLEY CO-EXEC DIRE 3.6% of Rev
SHEILA MARKLEY CO-EXEC DIRE 3.6% of Rev
THERESA BRAMLAGE Board Member —
BARBARA CRAFT Board Member —
STAN GAUNTT Secretary —
BRAD JOHNSON Board Member —
MARGARET KILPATRICK Board Member —
HELEN KOVAC Board Member —
LISA OSBOURN Treasurer —
MARY DEVIN PHD Board Member —
JANETTE VOGELSANG VICE-CHAIRPE —
FLORENCE WHITEBREAD Board President —
JOHN YORK Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 74 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.