Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
22
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 31.7% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 17.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 38.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 15.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 25.8% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 21.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 13.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 19.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 13.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 10.4% 35 Fragile Recovery
2013 6.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 16.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 8.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DESIREE C MILLER EXECUTIVE AR 17.0% of Rev
VALENTINA LUNATI Executive Director 12.4% of Rev
EDITH BENKOV BOARD PRESID
JAMIE FOX BOARD SECRET
MAYRA L GARCIA Board Member
MELISSA LUNARDINI Board Member
FELICIA SHAW BOARD TREASU

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DESIREE C MILLER EXECUTIVE AR 16.4% of Rev
VALENTINA LUNATI Executive Director 15.3% of Rev
EDITH BENKOV BOARD PRESID
VIVIENNE ESRIG BOARD TREASU
JAMIE FOX BOARD SECRET
MAYRA L GARCIA Board Member
MELISSA LUNARDINI Board Member
FELICIA SHAW Board Member
NATALIE SPIRO Board Member
SHANNON SWEENEY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER EVE THORN Artistic Director 10.0% of Rev
VALENTINA LUNATI DEVELOPMENT DIR 6.4% of Rev
VANESSA DURON Board Member 1.5% of Rev
CHAUNSA OYOS MANAGING DIRECT 0.8% of Rev
SHANNON SWEENEY Board President
VIVIENNE ESRIG Treasurer
JAMIE FOX Secretary
EDITH BENKOV Board Member
AURORA BEWICKE Board Member
MAYRA GARCIA Board Member
SYLVIE NGILLA MCGRAW Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER EVE THORN Artistic Director 6.6% of Rev
NICOLE RIES PROD MANAGER 4.6% of Rev
CALLIE JOHNSON Board Member 1.7% of Rev
SHANNON SWEENEY Board President
VIVIENNE ESRIG Treasurer
JAMIE FOX Secretary
JOHN BROOKS Board Member
EDITH BENKOV Board Member
ALEJANDRA ENCISO Board Member
MAYRA GARCIA Board Member
SYLVIE NGILLA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~19 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.