Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 4.8% 53 Fragile Recovery
2019 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 52 Fragile Recovery
2015 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT FORD Artistic Director 3.6% of Rev
ROBERT FORD Artistic Director 2.9% of Rev
SHANNON JASCH EXECUTIVE DI 2.6% of Rev
COREY HUFFTY Board Member 1.8% of Rev
SHANNON JASCH Board Member 1.8% of Rev
COREY HUFFTY Board Member 1.8% of Rev
ADAM ARROYOS Board Member
SANDY EDWARDS Board President
DENISE GARNER Board Member
MICHELLE GILL Board Member
SUSAN HALL Board Member
LEIGH HOPKINS Treasurer
SARAH KING Board Member
JOHANN KOMANDER Board Member
BRITTON LOTT Board Member
MARSHALL SAVIERS Board Member
JUDY SCHWAB Secretary
ESTHER SILVER-PARKER VICE PRESIDE
TODD SIMMONS Board Member
ANDREA WILSON Board Member
SANDY EDWARDS Board Member
DENISE GARNER Board Member
SUSAN HALL Board Member
LEIGH HOPKINS Treasurer
JOHANN KOMANDER Board Member
MARSHALL SAVIERS Board Member
JUDY SCHWAB Secretary
ESTER SILVER-PARKER VICE PRESIDE
TODD SIMMONS Board President
ANDREA WILSON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARTIN MILLER EXECUTIVE DI 3.4% of Rev
ROBERT FORD Artistic Director 3.2% of Rev
TODD SIMMONS Board President
ESTHER SILVER-PARKER VICE PRESIDE
JUDY SCHWAB Secretary
LEIGH HOPKINS Treasurer
DENISE GARNER Board Member
SUSAN HALL Board Member
LYNN DONALD CARVER Board Member
YVETTE MURPHY-ERBY Board Member
ANDREA WILSON Board Member
MARSHALL SAVIERS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARTIN MILLER EXECUTIVE DI 3.0% of Rev
ROBERT FORD Artistic Director 2.8% of Rev
LYNN DONALD CARVER Board Member
DENISE GARNER Board Member
SUSAN HALL Board Member
LEIGH HOPKINS Treasurer
LOUIS MARTIN Board Member
YVETTE MURPHY-ERBY Board Member
CATHERINE ROCHE Board Member
JUDY SCHWAB Secretary
ESTER SILVER-PARKER VICE PRESIDE
TODD SIMMONS Board President
TOD YESLOW Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 34 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points above the peer median (60 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.