Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 10.2% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 5.2% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 5.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 6.6% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 6.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 4.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 46 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — 7.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 10.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELEANOR MEDNICK Executive Direc 8.1% of Rev
TINA MCARTHUR Board President —
MARY CLYDE Board Member —
JON ELLENZWEIG Treasurer —
COREEN HESTER Board Member —
CHRIS HARTZELL Board Member —
SUSAN WHINERY Board Member —
VICKIE SOULIER Board Member —
CAROL SVETCOV Board Member —
ELIZA KOEFFEL Board Member —
WILLIAM MENTZER MD Board Member —
NOAH GRIFFIN Board Member —
PERRY BUTLER Board Member —
BRUCE FULLERTON Board President —
JULIE RYAN Board Member —
LORI STEIN Board Member —
KATE O'LAUGHLIN Board Member —
STEPHANIE DOUGLASS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLIE MEDNICK Executive Direc 8.8% of Rev
TINA MCARTHUR Board President —
MARY CLYDE Board President —
JON ELLENZWEIG Treasurer —
JAMIE GOLDSTEIN Secretary —
CHRIS HARTZELL Board Member —
SUSAN WHINERY Board Member —
VICKIE SOULIER Board Member —
CAROL SVETCOV Board Member —
ELIZA KOEFFEL Board Member —
WILLIAM MENTZER MD Board Member —
NOAH GRIFFIN Board Member —
PERRY BUTLER Board Member —
BRUCE FULLERTON Board Member —
JULIE RYAN Board Member —
LORI STEIN Board Member —
KATE O'LAUGHLIN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLIE MEDNICK Executive Direc 6.8% of Rev
CHRISTINA MCARTHUR Board President —
MARY CLYDE Board President —
JON ELLENZWEIG Treasurer —
JAMIE GOLDSTEIN Secretary —
CHRISTOPHER HARTZELL Board Member —
SUSAN WHINERY Board Member —
VICKIE SOULIER Board Member —
CAROL SVETCOV Board Member —
ELIZA HASKINS KOEFFEL Board Member —
WILLIAM MENTZER Board Member —
NOAH GRIFFIN Board Member —
PERRY BUTLER Board Member —
BRUCE FULLERTON Board Member —
JULIE RYAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.