Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
65
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 65 Stable Stable Watch
2022 65 Stable Stable Watch
2021 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 64 Stable Decline Risk
2019 65 Stable Stable Watch
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARGIE CALDERON Board President
RANDI WINFREE Board President
BOB MANASCO Board President
BRYCE HENDERSON Treasurer
ANNE SEYS Secretary
SHELLEY SPLEAR Board Member
AMY LOVIG Board Member
KIRSTEN JORGENSEN Board Member
BECKY DANIELS Board Member
JULIE BUZARD Board Member
AMY DIERICKS Board Member
MARSHALL PLUMLEY Board Member
MELANIE CURRAN Board Member
TINA POEL Board Member
DERRICK SEYS Board Member
EMILY NYQUIST Board Member
FAITH NELSON Board Member
STEPHANIE BAUER Board Member
VAL PLUMLEY Board Member
KELLI WILLIAMS Board Member
JENNIFER ULAM Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
65 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 196 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 64 points above the peer median (100 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 65 → 65 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.