Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
21
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 37.6% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 28.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 10.4% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 20.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 23.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 25.0% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 28.9% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 5.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Douglas Adams Board Member
Peter Bergman Board Member
Rob Castellini At Large
Micah Caroll Board Member
Jim Deluca Board Member
Whitney Gaskins Board Member
Kevin Grandison Board Member
Laura Mitchell Board Member
Andrea Ayers Board Member
Linnell Sullivan Board Member
Amy Hanson Board President
Bill Strickland Board Member
Jeffrey Hinebaugh Board Member
Rick Hulefeid Board Member
Kelly Kolar Board President
Bill Lecher Secretary
Carol Shea Board Member
Kisten Wevers Board Member
Melissa Wideman Board Member
Stephen Avila Treasurer
David Hummel Board Member
Kathleen Fish Board Member
Lee Carter Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Clara Martin Executive Director 37.6% of Rev
Douglas Adams Board Member
Peter Bergman Board Member
Rob Castellini At Large
Micah Caroll Board Member
Jim Deluca Board Member
Whitney Gaskins Board Member
Kevin Grandison Board Member
Laura Mitchell Board Member
Andrea Ayers Board Member
Linnell Sullivan Board Member
Amy Hanson Board President
Bill Strickland Board Member
Jeffrey Hinebaugh Board Member
Rick Hulefeid Board Member
Kelly Kolar Board President
Bill Lecher Secretary
Carol Shea Board Member
Kisten Wevers Board Member
Melissa Wideman Board Member
Stephen Avila Treasurer
David Hummel Board Member
Kathleen Fish Board Member
Lee Carter Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (0 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 30 → 21 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 37.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~31 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.