Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2023 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 46 Fragile Recovery
2021 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Meri Beth Jones Board President
Barney Colon Board President
Doug Ward Board President
Jason Majchrzak Board President
Peg Beyer Treasurer
Lora Sambora Secretary
Catherine Nagel General Counsel

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALAN SAGER Board Member
ANGELA NOWICKI Board Member
ANN THEA BECK Board Member
CATHERINE NAGEL GENERAL COUNSEL
DONALD CARDUCCI Board Member
DR JILLIAN BEYER Board Member
ELAINE RAPPOLD Board Member
GAIL FREEMAN Board Member
JASON MAJCHRZAK Board Member
JOAN LITWIN Board Member
JOANN LITWIN-CLINTON Board Member
LAUREN BINDER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points above the peer median (55 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 54 → 43 over 5 years (declining by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.