Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

"Implements a comprehensive arts and cultural initiative for the City of Sharonville, maintaining a fine arts center and hosting events to enrich the community."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 37 Fragile Recovery
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ZACHARY CONNELLY Treasurer
MANDY KING Secretary
STEVE SUBIT Board President
MICHELLE TAYLOR Board Member
DON TRAUTMANN VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EILEEN BERKE VICE PRESIDE
VIRGIL LOVITT II Board President
PAM ISON Treasurer
MICHELLE TAYLOR Board Member
JAY WAMPLER Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 49 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 5 points below the peer median (30 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 41 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.