Mission Drift
What does this mean?
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
The Path Forward
The Lodestar
A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | 2.0% | 54 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 58 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | 4.2% | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALISON MILES-GOODEMOTE | Treasurer | 2.0% of Rev | ||
| CHRISTIAN OLIVER | Board President | — | ||
| REBECCA PETHYBRIDGE | Board President | — | ||
| MICHELLE CURRIER | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANDREA AKINS | Board President | — | ||
| CHRISTIAN OLIVER | Board President | — | ||
| MICHELLE CURRIER | Secretary | — | ||
| ALISON MILES-GOODEMOTE | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALISON MILES GOODEMOTE | Treasurer | 2.0% of Rev | ||
| PATRICK VOTRA | Board President | — | ||
| ANDREA AKINS | Board President | — | ||
| MICHELLE CURRIER | Secretary | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 44 points above the peer median (75 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Mission Drift
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 2.0% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.