Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 7.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 9.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 10.8% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 7.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 11.7% 48 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 10.0% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 9.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 11.6% 48 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 14.6% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 14.3% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 14.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 15.8% 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CONSTANCE SULLIVAN-BLUM Executive Director 6.2% of Rev
CHRIS WALTERS Executive Director 0.2% of Rev
CLARE VAN DEN BLINK Board Member —
AMY IRVINE Board Member —
AMY SARNO Board Member —
WILLA VOGEL Board Member —
KAREN MARTIN Board President —
ERIC MEEK Secretary —
JOHN SIRIANNI Treasurer —
BABATUNDE AYANFODUN Board Member —
MICHELLE CAULFIELD Board President —
SHABNAM ALLWOOD Board Member —
JOY PERRY Board Member —
DIPAK CHOWDHURY Board Member —
NANCY GOETZ Board Member —
DAVE ROCHELLE Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CONSTANCE SULLIVAN-BLUM Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
KAREN MARTIN Board President —
BETH MANWARING Secretary —
AMY IRVINE Treasurer —
BABATUNDE AYANFODUN Board Member —
MICHELLE CAULFIELD Board Member —
PAUL DRESSEN Board Member —
JOY PERRY Board Member —
ERIC MEEK Board Member —
CYNTHIA RAJ Board Member —
DAVE ROCHELLE Board Member —
CLARE VAN DEN BLINK Board Member —
JOHN SIRIANNI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CONSTANCE SULLIVAN-BLUM Executive Director 5.5% of Rev
LESLIE CONNOLLY Board President —
DAVID HERTEL Board President —
KAREN MARTIN Board President —
BETH MANWARING Secretary —
ERIN MCMURROUGH Treasurer —
VANI AKULA Board Member —
MICHELLE CAULFIELD Board Member —
PAUL DRESSEN Board Member —
JESSICA OBER Board Member —
CYNTHIA RAJ Board Member —
ANDY ROCHESTER Board Member —
CLARE VAN DEN BLINK Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CONSTANCE SULLIVAN-BLUM Executive Director 5.3% of Rev
LESLIE CONNOLLY Board President —
DAVID HERTEL Board President —
KAREN MARTIN Board President —
BETH MANWARING Secretary —
ERIN MCMURROUGH Treasurer —
VANI AKULA Board Member —
MICHELLE CAULFIELD Board Member —
PAUL DRESSEN Board Member —
JEFF EATON Board Member —
JESSICA OBER Board Member —
CYNTHIA RAJ Board Member —
ANDY ROCHESTER Board Member —
CLARE VAN DEN BLINK Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 806 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.