Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 38 Fragile Recovery
2017 7.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 8.0% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 8.8% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 6.8% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 5.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2012 8.1% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 7.0% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY SOELL Board President
SARAH COMBS Board President
JACKIE MARKHAM-PRIAULX Board Member
SKIP BARBER Board Member
CHRIS DRAGO Board Member
LEE DAVIES Board Member
KIM FIERTZ Board Member
ROB FISH Board Member
KAREN GRIMALDI Board Member
GIGI NOYES Board Member
MELINDA SWEET Board Member
MEGHAN FLANAGAN Treasurer
SAVANNAH STEVENSON Secretary
AMY DANIS Board Member
JOHN CHRISTIAN LANGE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GIGI NOYES Board Member
KAREN GRIMALDI Board Member
SHELBY GREEN Board Member
BARBARA ZUCKER-PINCHOFF Board Member
MELINDA SWEET Board Member
MARSHALL SCHWARZ Board Member
BARRY PINCHOFF Board Member
ROB FISH Board Member
CHRIS DRAGO Board Member
SKIP BARBER Board Member
KIM FIERTZ Board Member
LEE DAVIES Board Member
EMILY SOELL Board President
MEGHAN FLANAGAN Treasurer
JACKIE MARKHAM-PRIAULX Secretary
SARAH COMBS Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Emily Soell Board President
Jacqueline Markham-Priaulx Secretary
Sarah Combs Board President
Skip Barber Board Member
ROB FISH Board Member
Lee A Davies Board Member
Chris Drago Board Member
Kim Fiertz Board Member
Shelby Green Board Member
Karen Grimaldi Board Member
Meghan Flanagan Board Member
Barbara Zucker-Pinchoff Board Member
Barry Pinchoff Board Member
GIGI NOYES Board Member
Melinda Sweet Board Member
Robert Levinstein Executive Director

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Cuaco Board Member
Bobbie Olsen Vice President
SARAH COMBS Board President
ROB FISH Board Member
Lee A Davies Board Member
Jacqueline Markham-Priaulx Secretary
Karen Grimaldi Board Member
Marshall Schwarz Board Member
Chris Drago Board Member
Kim Fiertz Board Member
Patricia Best Board President
Shelby Green Board Member
GIGI NOYES Board Member
Barbara Zucker-Pinchoff Board Member
Barry Pinchoff Board Member
Melinda Sweet Board Member
WILLIAM SUTER Emeritus Dir
EMILY SOELL Board President
SKIP BARBER Board Member
Robert Levinstein Executive Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points above the peer median (50 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.