Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 6.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 8.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 8.2% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 6.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 6.4% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 7.0% 50 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 5.5% 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 4.1% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 4.6% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — 4.2% 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 6.5% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 6.3% 42 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 7.8% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH SOBOL Executive Director 3.0% of Rev
LESLIE COLEMAN-SMITH GENERAL MANAGER 1.2% of Rev
EDWARD JAY LAFOND CPA CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 1.0% of Rev
DENNIS MOENCH Board President 0.7% of Rev
CHRIS SHILEY Artistic Director 0.7% of Rev
SUSAN LAW DAKE Board President —
CHARLES WAIT JR Board President —
ELEANOR K MULLANEY Secretary —
LINDA TOOHEY Treasurer —
ANTHONY R IANNIELLO ESQ Board Member —
JULIE FULLER Board Member —
GEORGE R HEARST III Board Member —
NORMA MEACHAM Board Member —
CHRIS MACKEY Board Member —
RONALD RIGGI Board Member —
DONALD J MCCORMACK Board Member —
GERALDINE GOLUB Board Member —
HEATHER MABEE Board Member —
SONNY BONACIO Board Member —
RICHARD HIGGINS Board Member —
SALLY BOTT Board Member —
JUDY HARRIGAN Board Member —
JASON WARD Board Member —
CJ DECRESCENTE Board Member —
SEAN LEONARD Board Member —
RAIMUNDO ARCHIBOLD Board Member —
WILLIAM MCELLEN Board Member —
ANDREA SPUNGEN Board Member —
CARL DEBRULE Board Member —
STEPHEN VERRAL MD Board Member —
MARTIN MBUGUA Board Member —
DR L OLIVER ROBINSON Board Member —
SUJATA N CHAUDHRY Board Member —
KEELEY ARDMAN DESALVO Board Member —
ASHLEY BUDD Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH SOBOL Executive Director 2.5% of Rev
EDWARD JAY LAFOND CPA CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 1.0% of Rev
LESLIE COLEMAN-SMITH GENERL MANAGER 0.9% of Rev
MARC GIOSI Board President 0.7% of Rev
SUSAN LAW DAKE Board President —
JEFF VUKELIC Board President —
ELEANOR K MULLANEY Secretary —
LINDA TOOHEY Treasurer —
ANTHONY R IANNIELLO ESQ Board Member —
JULIE FULLER Board Member —
GEORGE R HEARST III Board Member —
NORMA MEACHAM Board Member —
AMY CANTANUCCI Board Member —
RONALD RIGGI Board Member —
DONALD J MCCORMACK Board Member —
GERALDINE GOLUB Board Member —
HEATHER MABEE Board Member —
SONNY BONACIO Board Member —
RICHARD HIGGINS Board Member —
CHARLES WAIT JR Board Member —
JUDY HARRIGAN Board Member —
JASON WARD Board Member —
CJ DECRESCENTE Board Member —
JAYNE KEYES Board Member —
DAVID JERSEN Board Member —
WILLIAM MCELLEN Board Member —
ANDREA SPUNGEN Board Member —
CHARLENE WOOD Board Member —
MARTIN MBUGUA Board Member —
STEPHEN VERRAL MD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 54 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.