The Hollow Shell
The Hollow Shell
The Hollow Shell Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

The Hollow Shell

What does this mean?

A 10-year slow bleed. Revenue shrinks slightly every year, board size shrinks to the legal minimum, and the organization slowly burns assets to pay a single administrator.

The Path Forward

The Seed

Forces the ultimate reckoning. It requires the board to either secure massive transformative funding immediately or begin the legal process of dissolving to preserve whatever assets remain.

The Seed
The Seed
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: The Hollow Shell ↓
Overall
21
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Hollow Shell

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 — — — 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2023 — — — 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stephanie Haring Board Member —
Geoff Gaebe Board President —
Ben Watts Board Member —
James Higgins Board Member —
Edward Kamholz Board Member —
Lauren Amira Board Member —
Colin Godwin Board President —
Rachel Smith Goodman Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: The Hollow Shell

A 10-year slow bleed. Revenue shrinks slightly every year, board size shrinks to the legal minimum, and the organization slowly burns assets to pay a single administrator.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 21 over 5 years (declining by 24 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.