Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
36
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 15.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 34.1% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 18.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA WALKER Board President
JHONG KIM CHAIRMAN
ALICE BERGERON Board Member
ALAN AURELIA ACTING TREASUER
JAMES CALDERON Board Member
BARBARA WALKER Board President
MYLES PAULSEN Board Member
JHONG KIM CHAIRMAN
RON COLBERT Board Member
ALICE BERGERON Board Member
ALAN - ARTHUR AURELIA Board Member
ALAN AURELIA ACTING TREASUER
LESLIE JAY Board Member
JAMES CALDERON Board Member
MYLES PAULSEN Board Member
RON COLBERT Board Member
ALAN - ARTHUR AURELIA Board Member
LESLIE JAY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALAN - ARTHUR AURELIA Board Member 12.1% of Rev
ALAN - ARTHUR AURELIA Board Member 12.1% of Rev
LESLIE JAY Board Member 1.0% of Rev
LESLIE JAY Board Member 1.0% of Rev
ALICE BERGERON Board Member 0.6% of Rev
ALICE BERGERON Board Member 0.6% of Rev
BARBARA WALKER Board President
JHONG KIM CHAIRMAN
ALAN AURELIA ACTING TREASUER
JENNA CALDERON Board Member
MYLES PAULSEN Board Member
RON COLBERT Board Member
BARBARA WALKER Board President
JHONG KIM CHAIRMAN
ALAN AURELIA ACTING TREASUER
JENNA CALDERON Board Member
MYLES PAULSEN Board Member
RON COLBERT Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alan-Arthur Aurelia Executive Director 16.7% of Rev
Alan-Arthur Aurelia Executive Director 14.9% of Rev
Alan Aurelia Artistic Director 5.2% of Rev
Alan Aurelia Artistic Director 2.9% of Rev
Alice Bergeron Executive Director 2.3% of Rev
Alice Bergeron Executive Director 1.7% of Rev
Leslie Jay Board Member 1.4% of Rev
Leslie Jay Board Member 0.6% of Rev
Barbara Walker Board President
Jhong Kim Chairman
Jenna Calderon Treasurer
Myles Paulson Board Member
Ron Colbert Board Member
Bonnie Fernandez Board Member
Barbara Walker Board President
Jhong Kim Chairman
Jenna Calderon Treasurer
Myles Paulson Board Member
Ron Colbert Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 11 points below the peer median (20 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.