Acute Stabilization
What does this mean?
A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.
The Path Forward
The Dawn
Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | — | — | — | 28 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 14 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | 3,720.7% | 17 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | 20.0% | 28 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | 18.2% | 28 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | 17.6% | 42 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | 19.1% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2013 | — | — | 6.5% | 54 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | 10.3% | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 42 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melanie Joseph | Artistic Director | 499.5% of Rev | ||
| Morgan Jenness | Board Member | — | ||
| Vivian Mamelak | Treasurer | — | ||
| Anne Erbe | Board President | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 24 points below the peer median (5 vs. 29).
5-year trend: Acute Stabilization
A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.
Overall score has gone from 28 → 28 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.