Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2020 9.5% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 11.7% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 6.4% 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 10.1% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 10.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2015 14.0% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 6.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 6.0% 44 Fragile Recovery
2012 9.0% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 15.4% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pascal Rioult Board President 4.3% of Rev
Joyce Herring Secretary 3.7% of Rev
Amy Harrison Executive Director 2.5% of Rev
Jane Penn Executive Director 1.5% of Rev
Hope Greenfield Board President
Susan Fraser Treasurer
Joseph W Armbrust Board Member
Judy S Gordon Board Member
Hazel Kandall Board Member
Lisa Mueller Board Member
Harsha Murthy Board Member
Laura S Norman Board Member
Keith Pattiz Board Member
Terry Rieser Board Member
Marianne Coughlin Board Member
John MacKinnon Board Member
Tracy Capune Board Member
Lee Traub Emeritus
Donald L Holley Esq Board President
Ellen W Harris In Memoriam
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.