Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 2.8% 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 6.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 8.1% 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 4.6% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 3.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 3.9% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 4.7% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 2.8% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 4.1% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Morgan Artistic Director 2.7% of Rev
Debra Hook Board Member —
Debra Walton Board Member —
Mia Moravis Board Member —
Joan T Mischo Board Member —
Timothy F Collins Board Member —
Bernard Carragher Board Member —
Claudia Zahn Board Member —
Laurence Holzman Board Member —
James A Kierstead Board Member —
Charlotte Rosenblatt Board Member —
Katherine Huang Board Member —
Alan Govenar Board Member —
Gerald F Fisher Treasurer —
Molly Pickering Grose Secretary —
Riki Kane Larimer Board President —
Joan Ross Sorkin Board President —
W David McCoy Chairman —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Morgan Artistic Director 2.6% of Rev
W David McCoy Chairman —
Joan Ross Sorkin Board President —
Riki Kane Larimer Board President —
Molly Pickering Grose Secretary —
Gerald F Fisher Treasurer —
Alan Govenar Board Member —
Katherine Huang Board Member —
Charlotte Rosenblatt Board Member —
James A Kierstead Board Member —
Laurence Holzman Board Member —
Claudia Zahn Board Member —
Bernard Carragher Board Member —
Tim Collins Board Member —
Joan Mischo Board Member —
Mia Moravis Board Member —
Debra Walton Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Morgan Artistic Director 1.9% of Rev
W David McCoy Chairman —
Joan Ross Sorkin Board President —
Riki Kane Larimer Board President —
Molly Pickering Grose Secretary —
Gerald F Fisher Treasurer —
Alan Govenar Board Member —
Katherine Huang Board Member —
Charlotte Rosenblatt Board Member —
James A Kierstead Board Member —
Laurence Holzman Board Member —
Claudia Zahn Board Member —
Bernard Carragher Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Morgan Artistic Director 2.1% of Rev
W David McCoy Chairman —
Joan Ross Sorkin Board President —
Riki Kane Larimer Board President —
Molly Pickering Grose Secretary —
Gerald F Fisher Treasurer —
Alan Govenar Board Member —
Katherine Huang Board Member —
Charlotte Rosenblatt Board Member —
James A Kierstead Board Member —
Laurence Holzman Board Member —
Claudia Zahn Board Member —
Bernard Carragher Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.