Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
28
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 19.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden 21.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 11.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 8.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 4.8% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 5.2% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 5.3% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 4.8% 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 4.7% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 4.8% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 2.2% 41 Fragile Recovery
2012 3.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 3.2% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXANDER SETH CAMERON Board Member 20.1% of Rev
WILLIAM FLOYD Board President
ALLISON RUSSO Board President
JESSICA OGILVIE Board President
CYNTHIA WAIWRIGHT Board President
ANDREW ZUCKERMAN Secretary
LAURIE HARRIS BRENNAN Treasurer
ANNA BACKER Board Member
BARBARA BRIONES Board Member
KATELIJNE DE BACKER Board Member
ALEXANDRA SOROKOLIT-FRANKEL Board Member
MARISSA MCMAHON Board Member
ELIZABETH PEPPERMAN Board Member
KATHERINE SALYI Board Member
MARNIE BERK Board Member
FREDRICA POLLACK FORD Board Member
JILLIAN MARCUS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXANDER SETH CAMERON EXEC. DIR. (EFF 2/20) 18.1% of Rev
ERICA FREYBERGER Board Member 12.0% of Rev
WILLIAM FLOYD Board President
ALLISON RUSSO Board President
LISELOTTE VINCE Board President
CYNTHIA WAIWRIGHT Board President
ANDREW ZUCKERMAN Secretary
LAURIE HARRIS BRENNAN Treasurer
ANNA BACKER Board Member
GEOFF COOK Board Member
KATELIJNE DE BACKER Board Member
ALEXANDRA SOROKOLIT-FRANKEL Board Member
RICO GATSON Board Member
MARISSA MCMAHON Board Member
JESSICA OGILVIE Board Member
ELIZABETH PEPPERMAN Board Member
STEVEN PERELMAN Board Member
KATHERINE SALYI Board Member
MICKALENE THOMAS Board Member
MARNIE BERK Board Member
FREDRICA POLLACK FORD Board Member
JILLIAN MARCUS Board Member
LISA SCHIFF Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERICA FREYBERGER Board Member 12.7% of Rev
BARBARA HUNT-MCLANAHAN EXEC. DIR. (THRU 6/19) 3.8% of Rev
WILLIAM FLOYD Board President
ALLISON RUSSO Board President
LISELOTTE VINCE Board President
CYNTHIA WAIWRIGHT Board President
ANDREW ZUCKERMAN Secretary
LAURIE HARRIS BRENNAN Treasurer
ANNA BACKER Board Member
GEOFF COOK Board Member
KATELIJNE DE BACKER Board Member
ALEXANDRA SOROKOLIT-FRANKEL Board Member
RICO GATSON Board Member
MARISSA MCMAHON Board Member
JESSICA OGILVIE Board Member
ELIZABETH PEPPERMAN Board Member
STEVEN PERELMAN Board Member
SABRINA LEICHTER RUDIN Board Member
KATHERINE SALYI Board Member
MICKALENE THOMAS Board Member
ALEXANDER SETH CAMERON EXEC. DIR. (EFF 2/20)
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 13 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points below the peer median (0 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 28 over 5 years (declining by 7 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.