Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 27.1% 48 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 26.2% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 28.3% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 36.2% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 25.0% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2018 20.8% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 21.5% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 22.7% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 18.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 15.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 14.4% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 16.8% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 16.4% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LAWRENCE Executive Director 17.9% of Rev
MARYA MARTIN Artistic Director 9.4% of Rev
KENNETH S DAVIDSON CHAIRMAN
JUDITH LITTLE Board Member
ANNE GILCHRIST HALL Board Member
HELEN MEATES Treasurer
SANDRA R MEYER Board Member
PAIGE L NAGLE Board Member
KATHERYN C PATTERSON Board Member
JOSEPH L RICE III Board Member
ARLENE ALDA Board Member
PAUL B GRIDLEY Board Member
STEVEN N RAPPAPORT Board Member
ANA R DANIEL Board Member
BILLY HULT Board Member
JOYCE MENSCHEL Board Member
EDWARD D BURKE JR Board Member
GABRIELLA SULTANIK ELGHANAYAN Board Member
FRANCI J BLASSBERG Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LAWRENCE Executive Director 17.7% of Rev
MARYA MARTIN Artistic Director 7.2% of Rev
KENNETH S DAVIDSON CHAIRMAN
JUDITH LITTLE Board Member
ANNE GILCHRIST HALL Board Member
HELEN MEATES Treasurer
SANDRA R MEYER Board Member
PAIGE L NAGLE Board Member
KATHERYN C PATTERSON Board Member
JOSEPH L RICE III Board Member
PETER P D' ANGELO Board Member
ARLENE ALDA Board Member
PAUL B GRIDLEY Board Member
STEVEN N RAPPAPORT Board Member
ANA R DANIEL Board Member
BILLY HULT Board Member
JOYCE MENSCHEL Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LAWRENCE Executive Director 16.2% of Rev
MARYA MARTIN Artistic Director 5.1% of Rev
KENNETH S DAVIDSON CHAIRMAN
JUDITH LITTLE Board Member
ANNE GILCHRIST HALL Board Member
HELEN MEATES Treasurer
SANDRA R MEYER Board Member
PAIGE L NAGLE Board Member
KATHERYN C PATTERSON Board Member
JOSEPH L RICE III Board Member
PETER P D' ANGELO Board Member
ARLENE ALDA Board Member
PAUL B GRIDLEY Board Member
STEVEN N RAPPAPORT Board Member
ANA R DANIEL Board Member
BILLY HULT Board Member
JOYCE MENSCHEL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LAWRENCE Executive Director 16.1% of Rev
MARYA MARTIN Artistic Director 5.3% of Rev
KENNETH S DAVIDSON CHAIRMAN
JUDITH LITTLE Board Member
ANNE GILCHRIST HALL Board Member
HELEN MEATES Treasurer
SANDRA R MEYER Board Member
PAIGE L NAGLE Board Member
KATHERYN C PATTERSON Board Member
JOSEPH L RICE III Board Member
PETER P D' ANGELO Board Member
ARLENE ALDA Board Member
PAUL B GRIDLEY Board Member
STEVEN N RAPPAPORT Board Member
ANA R DANIEL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 27.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~10 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.