Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
24
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 31.5% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 81.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 1.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 28.4% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 14.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 11.6% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 12.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 14.9% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 11.2% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 12.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 18.5% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 16.8% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Jennings Artistic Director 28.2% of Rev
Jane Culley Board President 22.1% of Rev
Terrence Fergus Board Member
Ted Baehr Board Member
Suzanne McGrath Board Member
Joseph Krawczyk Secretary
Jacqueline Pace Treasurer
Courtney Everette Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Jennings Artistic Director 20.4% of Rev
Jane Culley Board President 11.1% of Rev
Terrence Fergus Board Member
Ted Baehr Board Member
Suzanne McGrath Board Member
Joseph Krawczyk Secretary
Jacqueline Pace Treasurer
Courtney Everette Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Jennings Artistic Director 18.3% of Rev
Jane Culley Board President 9.7% of Rev
Jacqueline Pace Treasurer
Joseph Krawczyk Board Member
Suzanne McGrath Board Member
Terrence Fergus Board Member
Courtney Everette Board Member
Ted Beher Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Jennings Artistic Director 12.1% of Rev
Jane Culley Board President 5.2% of Rev
Jane Culley Board President 0.5% of Rev
James Jennings Artistic Director 0.3% of Rev
Jacqueline Pace Treasurer
Joseph Krawczyk Secretary
Suzanne McGrath Board Member
Carolyn Odell Board Member
MacMillan Johnson Board Member
Jacqueline Pace Treasurer
Joseph Krawczyk Secretary
Suzanne McGrath Board Member
Carolyn Odell Board Member
MacMillan Johnson Board Member
Gilbert Ancowitz Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~19 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.