Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 13.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 5.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 3.9% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 8.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 5.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 14.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 9.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 1.9% 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 57.6% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 13.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 5.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 5.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 5.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL CAPASSO GENERAL DIRE 5.1% of Rev
KRISTIN SAMPSON Secretary 1.6% of Rev
MARTINA ARROYO Board Member
HARRIET NEWMAN COHEN Board Member
MARCO FIORESE Board Member
DENYCE GRAVES Board Member
JENNIFER GUCCI Board Member
GRANT HANESSIAN Board Member
THOMAS MINA JR BOARD CHAIRM
JOHNATHAN MILLER Board Member
ROY NIEDERHOFFER Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL CAPASSO GENERAL DIRE 2.6% of Rev
KRISTIN SAMPSON Secretary 2.6% of Rev
JENNY GUCCI Board Member
MARA KAPLAN-PRUZANSKI Board Member
DIANA LANGER-MARCUS Board Member
ROY NIEDERHOFFER BOARD CHAIRM
TOBIAS PICKER Board Member
KENNETH ROSEN BOARD CHAIRM

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL CAPASSO GENERAL DIRE 8.5% of Rev
KRISTIN SAMPSON Secretary 2.9% of Rev
JENNY GUCCI Board Member
MARA KAPLAN-PRUZANSKI Board Member
DIANA LANGER-MARCUS Board Member
ROY NIEDERHOFFER BOARD CHAIRM
TOBIAS PICKER Board Member
KENNETH ROSEN BOARD CHAIRM
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 32 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.