Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 2.2% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 3.3% 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 — — 6.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 16.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 4.9% 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 2.7% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 4.2% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 5.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 5.2% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 5.9% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 5.9% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 — — 5.5% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY HAGOPIAN Secretary 2.2% of Rev
HOLLY POE DURBIN Board President —
KRISTIN SOSNOWSKY Board President —
TIZA GARLAND Board Member —
JULIA GIBSON Board Member —
KEVIN MCCLATCHY Board Member —
DEANNA FITZGERALD Board President —
TRACY NUNNALLY Board Member —
MARY BETH EASLEY Board Member —
KIP MARSH Treasurer —
MILAGROS PONCE DE LEON Board Member —
ROBIN SNELLER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY HAGOPIAN Secretary 2.1% of Rev
HOLLY POE DURBIN Board President —
KRISTIN SOSNOWSKY Treasurer —
ROBERT RAMIREZ Board President —
MARISSA CHIBAS Board Member —
COLLEEN KELLY Board Member —
BRANT POPE Board President —
BRACKLEY FRAYER Board Member —
DEANNA FITZGERALD Board Member —
MICHAEL BRADFORD Board Member —
MARY BETH EASLEY Board Member —
KIP MARSH Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY HAGOPIAN Secretary 2.1% of Rev
HOLLY POE DURBIN Board President —
KRISTIN SOSNOWSKY Treasurer —
ROBERT RAMIREZ Board President —
MARISSA CHIBAS Board Member —
COLLEEN KELLY Board Member —
BRANT POPE Board President —
BRACKLEY FRAYER Board Member —
DEANNA FITZGERALD Board Member —
MICHAEL BRADFORD Board Member —
MARY BETH EASLEY Board Member —
KIP MARSH Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY HAGOPIAN Secretary 1.9% of Rev
HOLLY POE DURBIN Board President —
JACOB PINHOLSTER Treasurer —
ROBERT RAMIREZ Board President —
MARISSA CHIBAS Board Member —
COLLEEN KELLY Board Member —
KRISTIN SOSNOWSKY Board Member —
BRANT POPE Board President —
BRACKLEY FRAYER Board Member —
DEANNA FITZGERALD Board Member —
MICHAEL BRADFORD Board Member —
MARY BETH EASLEY Board Member —
KIP MARSH Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 56 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A0.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 66 points below the peer median (0 vs. 66).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.