Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 33.3% 54 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 57 Fragile Recovery
2021 28.1% 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 37.6% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 29.6% 52 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jane McPherson Board Member 37.4% of Rev
Hugh O'Gorman Board President
Amy Herzberg Board President
Gerald Glackin Treasurer
David Bridel Board Member
Peter Jay Fernandez Board Member
Michele Shay Board Member
Steven Rosenblatt Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jane McPherson Board Member 33.3% of Rev
Hugh O'Gorman Board President
Amy Herzberg Board President
Gerald Glackin Treasurer
Kenneth Noel Mitchell Board Member
Peter Jay Fernandez Board Member
Michele Shay Board Member
Steven Rosenblatt Board Member
David Bridel Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jane McPherson Board Member 29.1% of Rev
Hugh O'Gorman Board President
Amy Herzberg Board President
Gerald Glackin Treasurer
Kenneth Noel Mitchell Board Member
Peter Jay Fernandez Board Member
Michele Shay Board Member
Steven Rosenblatt Board Member
David Bridel Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jane McPherson Board Member 27.0% of Rev
Hugh O'Gorman Board President
Amy Herzberg Board President
Gerald Glackin Treasurer
Kenneth Noel Mitchell Board Member
Peter Jay Fernandez Board Member
Michele Shay Board Member
Steven Rosenblatt Board Member
David Bridel Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jane McPherson Board Member 25.2% of Rev
Peter Jay Fernandez Board Member 1.7% of Rev
Kenneth Noel Mitchell Board Member 1.0% of Rev
Michele Shay Board Member 0.3% of Rev
Steven Rosenblatt Board Member
Hugh O'Gorman Board President
Amy Herzberg Board President
Gerald Glackin Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 49 points above the peer median (80 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~23 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.