Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 12.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 10.8% 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 12.9% 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 17.8% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 20.4% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 16.6% 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 35.9% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 24.6% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 36.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 42.3% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 34.5% 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jane Jung Executive Director 4.2% of Rev
Sara Zatz Board Member 4.1% of Rev
John Chong Artistic Director
Bruce Allardice Executive Director
Cathy Barbash Board Member
Amy Chin Board President
Deirdre Valente Board President
Kim Chan Board Member
Lillian Cho Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bruce Allardice Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
John Chong Artistic Director 3.1% of Rev
Cathy Barbash Board Member
Amy Chin Board President
Deirdre Valente Board President
Kim Chan Board Member
Lillian Cho Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bruce Allardice Executive Director 4.2% of Rev
John Chong Artistic Director 3.4% of Rev
Cathy Barbash Board Member
Amy Chin Board President
Deirdre Valente Board Member
Miranda Schiller Secretary
Kim Chan Board Member
Lillian Cho Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bruce Allardice Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
John Chong Artistic Director 4.3% of Rev
Cathy Barbash Board Member
Amy Chin Board President
Deirdre Valente Board Member
Miranda Schiller Secretary
Kim Chan Board Member
Lillian Cho Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.