Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 5.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 5.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 5.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 4.7% 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 6.6% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 6.4% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 5.5% 44 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 7.3% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VIVIANA BIANCHI EXECUTIVE DI 5.7% of Rev
CHARLES RICE-GONZALEZ Board President —
SHANNON HARTLEY Vice President —
EILEEN NEWMAN VICE PRESIDE —
AMINAH ABDUL-MAJEED Secretary —
LEENDA BONILLA Board Member —
ALEXANDER CAMPOS Board Member —
CATHY KAPLAN Board Member —
TEJUANA ROBERTS Board Member —
LISA SORIN Board Member —
RHINA VALENTIN Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VIVIANA BIANCHI EXECUTIVE DI 5.4% of Rev
CHARLES RICE-GONZALEZ Board President —
AMINA ABDUL-MAJEED Secretary —
SHANNON HARTLEY Treasurer —
LEENDA BONILLA Board Member —
ALEXANDER CAMPOS Board Member —
CATHY KAPLAN Board Member —
EILEEN NEWMAN Board Member —
LISA SORIN Board Member —
RHINA VALENTIN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VIVIANA BIANCHI Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
VIVIANA BIANCHI Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
JEAN TATGE Board Member —
EILEEN NEWMAN Board Member —
MARK MCKEQESQ Board Member —
ALEXANDER CAMPOS Board Member —
LISA SORIN Board Member —
LEENDA BONILLA Board Member —
SHEREEN BRIGGS Secretary —
SHANNON HARTLEY Board Member —
CHARLES RICE-GONZALEZ Board President —
CATHY KAPLAN Board Member —
RHINA VALENTIN Board Member —
JEAN TATGE Board Member —
EILEEN NEWMAN Board Member —
MARK MCKEQESQ Board Member —
ALEXANDER CAMPOS Board Member —
LISA SORIN Board Member —
LEENDA BONILLA Board Member —
SHEREEN BRIGGS Secretary —
SHANNON HARTLEY Board Member —
CHARLES RICE-GONZALEZ Board President —
CATHY KAPLAN Board Member —
RHINA VALENTIN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VIVIANA BIANCHI Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
VIVIANA BIANCHI Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
SHEREEN BRIGGS Secretary —
SHANNON HARTLEY Board Member —
CHARLES RICE-GONZALEZ Board President —
JEAN TATGE Board Member —
EILEEN NEWMAN Board Member —
MARK MCKEQ ESQ Board Member —
ALEXANDER CAMPOS Board Member —
LISA SORIN Board Member —
SHEILA MCDANIEL Treasurer —
SHEREEN BRIGGS Secretary —
SHANNON HARTLEY Board Member —
CHARLES RICE-GONZALEZ Board President —
JEAN TATGE Board Member —
EILEEN NEWMAN Board Member —
MARK MCKEQ ESQ Board Member —
ALEXANDER CAMPOS Board Member —
LISA SORIN Board Member —
SHEILA MCDANIEL Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 806 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.