Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
26
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 29.3% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 21.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 23.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 12.3% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 12.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 9.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 11.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 14.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 4.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 3.8% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 6.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 51.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY SIEGLER Board Member 29.3% of Rev
JASMINE AHMED Board Member
PAMELA ANDERSON Board Member
BILL BARONI Board Member
DR WILLIAM B DRAKE JR Board Member
MR PETER PERLMAN Board Member
JUDITH E RINEARSON ESQ Board President
SHERRY WRIGHT Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY SIEGLER Executive Director 28.4% of Rev
JUDITH ERINEARSONESQ Board President
PAMELA ANDERSON Treasurer
DR WILLIAM B DRAKE JR Board Member
PETER PERLMAN Board Member
TERI THOMPSON Board Member
SHERRY WRIGHT Board Member
BILL BARONI Board Member
JOE LAMENDOLA Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY SIEGLER Executive Director 25.3% of Rev
JUDITH ERINEARSONESQ Board President
MYRA LEIGH TOBIN Treasurer
PAMELA ANDERSON Board Member
DR WILLIAM B DRAKE JR Board Member
PETER PERLMAN Board Member
TERI THOMPSON Board Member
SHERRY WRIGHT Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY SIEGLER Executive Director 25.3% of Rev
JUDITH ERINEARSONESQ Board President
MYRA LEIGH TOBIN Treasurer
PAMELA ANDERSON Board Member
DR WILLIAM B DRAKE JR Board Member
PETER PERLMAN Board Member
TERI THOMPSON Board Member
SHERRY WRIGHT Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~15 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.