Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
41
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 16.0% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 11.4% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 0.8% 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 6.5% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 7.2% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 6.2% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 5.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 5.8% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 5.5% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 5.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID BONDY Board Member
BLAIR TALCOTT Board Member
MARY NEUMANN Board Member
JEFFREY SCHLOSSER Board President
EDWIN SIRLIN CHAIRTREASURER
NANCY GREBEY Board Member
MARY NEUMANN Board Member
BLAIR TALCOTT Board Member
TAYLOR NICHOLAS Board Member
DAVID BONDY Board Member
EDWIN SIRLIN CHAIRTREASURER
NANCY GREBEY Secretary
LORNA J NORRIS Executive Director
JEFFREY SCHLOSSER Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORNA JANE NORRIS Executive Director 25.6% of Rev
JEFFREY SCHLOSSER Board President
EDWIN SIRLIN Treasurer
MARY NEUMANN Board Member
NANCY GREBEY Secretary
DAVID BONDY Board Member
TAYLOR NICHOLS Board Member
BLAIR TALCOTT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 46 → 41 over 5 years (declining by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.