Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.3% 44 Fragile Recovery
2022 2.6% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 6.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 4.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 2.8% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 4.4% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 5.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 6.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 7.1% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 10.1% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 12.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 10.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Piruz Partow E.D. Thru 7/21 2.6% of Rev
Brian Adamczyk Executive Dir. 2.3% of Rev
Shelby Green Board President
Peter Bordes Board President
Brian Pope Board President
Jordan Tamagni Secretary
Drew Bernstein Treasurer
Chuck Swartz Board Member
Hadas Shahar Board Member
John Flores Board Member
Maria Pham Board Member
Francois Leninger Board Member
Dr Mark Braithwaite Board Member
Zach Kouwe Board Member
Windy Lawrence Board Member
Sasha Lazard Board Member
Phil Rutherford Board Member
Elizabeth Schmidt Board Member
Angela Howard Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Piruz Partow E.D. Thru 7/21 2.6% of Rev
Brian Adamczyk Executive Dir. 0.8% of Rev
Shelby Green Board President
Peter Bordes Board President
Brian Pope Board President
Jordan Tagmagni Secretary
Julia Yu Treasurer
Drew Bernstein Board Member
Daniel Bauer Board Member
Mark Braithwaite Board Member
Crocker Coulson Board Member
John Flores Board Member
Zach Kouwe Board Member
Francoise Leininger Board Member
Windy Lawrence Board Member
Samantha Mcdonald Board Member
Jacqueline Parker Board Member
Maria Pham Board Member
Elizabeth Schmidt Board Member
Chuck Schwartz Board Member
Hadas Shahar Board Member
Jeffery Tannenbaum Board Member
Carletta Higginson Board Member
Angela Howard Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Piruz Partow Board Member 2.6% of Rev
Shelby Green Board President
Peter Bordes Board President
Brian Pope Secretary
Jordan Tagmagni Secretary
Julia Yu Treasurer
Drew Bernstein Board Member
Mark Braithwaite Board Member
Crocker Colson Board Member
John Flores Board Member
Carletta Higginson Board Member
Zach Kouwe Board Member
Windy Lawrence Board Member
Jacqueline Parker Board Member
Samantha McDonald Board Member
Elizabeth Schmidt Board Member
Chuck Schwartz Board Member
Hadas Shahar Board Member
Jeffery Tannenbaum Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 44 over 5 years (improving by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.