Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 18.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 9.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 12.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 14.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 8.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 8.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 7.4% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 4.8% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 10.3% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 15.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 18.2% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 11.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 8.7% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 11.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN SILVERSTEIN Artistic Director 9.4% of Rev
ASHLEY DIGIORGI MANAGING PRO 8.6% of Rev
GEORGE BEAN Treasurer
BILL BRADFORD Treasurer
ELIZABETH CORRADINO Secretary
ROSE COURTNEY Board Member
LINDA D'ONOFRIO Board President
SUSIE GOULD Board Member
CHISA HUTCHINSON Board Member
MARSHA MASON Board Member
NISHA SHETH Board Member
PATRICIA STOCKHAUSEN Board Member
JASON TAM Board Member
CHRIS YEGEN CHAIRMAN

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS YEGEN Chairman
LINDA D'ONOFRIO Board President
GEORGE BEAN Treasurer
BILL BRADFORD Treasurer
ELIZABETH CORRADINO Secretary
ROSE COURTNEY Board Member
MARSHA MASON Board Member
NISHA SHETH Treasurer
PATRICIA STOCKHAUSEN Board Member
CHARLIE MacLEOD Board Member
SUSIE GOULD Board Member
CHISA HUTCHINSON Board Member
JASON TAM Board President
AMYT ECKSTEIN Board Member
JONATHAN SILVERSTEIN Artistic Director

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN SILVERSTEIN Artistic Director 7.2% of Rev
CHRIS YEGEN Chairman
LINDA D'ONOFRIO Board President
GEORGE BEAN Treasurer
BILL BRADFORD Treasurer
ELIZABETH CORRADINO Secretary
ROSE COURTNEY Board Member
MARSHA MASON Board Member
NISHA SHETH Board Member
PATRICIA STOCKHAUSEN Board Member
DAVID F WERTHEIMER Board Member
EMMY ZUCKERMAN Board Member
CHISA HUTCHINSON Board Member
JASON TAM Board Member
EMILY WEXLER Board Member
SHARON TZUANG Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN SILVERSTEIN Artistic Director 6.8% of Rev
CHRIS YEGEN Chairman
LINDA D'ONOFRIO Board President
GEORGE BEAN Treasurer
BILL BRADFORD Treasurer
ELIZABETH CORRADINO Secretary
ROSE COURTNEY Board Member
MARSHA MASON Board Member
NISHA SHETH Board Member
PATRICIA STOCKHAUSEN Board Member
DAVID F WERTHEIMER Board Member
EMMY ZUCKERMAN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.