Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 15.5% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 14.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 14.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 15.7% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 15.3% 41 Fragile Recovery
2018 19.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 18.4% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 20.5% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 22.4% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 22.3% 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 21.5% 41 Fragile Recovery
2012 17.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 45.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNA CITRON SCHWAB Executive Director 15.2% of Rev
ARNOLD FRANKLIN Board Member
ZOHAR BACHIRY Board Member
MURIEL GOLDBERG Board President
ELLEN KOPPELMAN Board Member
JOAN LOREN Board Member
YASMIN PINHASOV-MALAEV Board Member
DANIEL SHULMAN Treasurer
ARIEL TAVOR Board Member
DANIEL TAVAKOLI Board President
ERIKA WITOVER Board President
JOSHUA FRANKEL Board Member
LILY SOMMER Board Member
PAUL KERBEL Board Member
ABBY BIESMAN Board Member
SHANIE REICHMAN Board Member
JOSEPH STERN Board Member
HILLEL WALLICK Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNA CITRON SCHWAB Executive Director 15.5% of Rev
ILENE EDER Secretary
ARNOLD FRANKLIN Board Member
ZOHAR BACHIRY Board Member
MURIEL GOLDBERG Board President
BOBI KLOTZ Board Member
ELLEN KOPPELMAN Board Member
NICKI KORNBLUTH Board Member
JOAN LOREN Board Member
YASMIN PINHASOV-MALAEV Board Member
DANIEL SHULMAN Treasurer
ARIEL TAVOR Board Member
DANIEL TAVAKOLI Board President
HOWARD WALLICK Board President
ERIKA WITOVER Board President
JOSHUA FRANKEL Board Member
LILY SOMMER Board Member
PAUL KERBEL Board Member
ABBY BIESMAN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jenna Citron Schwab Executive Director 13.2% of Rev
Ilene Eder Secretary
Arnold Franklin Board Member
Zohar Bachiry Board Member
Muriel Goldberg Board President
Bobi Klotz Board Member
Ellen Koppelman Board Member
Nicki Kornbluth Board Member
Joan Loren Board Member
Yasmin Pinhasov-Malaev Board Member
Daniel Shulman Treasurer
Ariel Tavor Board Member
Daniel Tavakoli Board President
Howard Wallick Board Member
Erika Witover Board President
Joshua Frankel Board Member
Lily Sommer Board Member
Paul Kerbel Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jenna Citron Schwab Executive Director 11.9% of Rev
Ilene Eder Secretary
Arnold Franklin Board Member
Zohar Bachiry Board Member
Muriel Goldberg Board President
Bobi Klotz Board Member
Ellen Koppelman Board Member
Nicki Kornbluth Board Member
Joan Loren Board Member
Yasmin Pinhasov-Malaev Board Member
Daniel Shulman Board Member
Ariel Tavor Board Member
Daniel Tavakoli Treasurer
Howard Wallick Board President
Erika Witover Board President
Joshua Frankel Board Member
Lily Sommer Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.