Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 25.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 19.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 19.5% 35 Fragile Recovery
2020 31.6% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 15.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 18.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 20.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 22.7% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stephen Kaplin Treasurer 14.9% of Rev
Kuang Yu Fong Board Member 10.6% of Rev
Natalie Christo Board President
Virginia Wang Board Member
Fanping Chen Board Member
Vera Lai-Buonora Board Member
Jane Wei Board Member
Richard Chang Board Member
Benton Fairservis Teviot
Junling Wang Board Member
Xiaoming Zhang Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kuang Yu Fong Board Member 10.0% of Rev
Stephen Kaplin Board Member 9.8% of Rev
Junling Wang Board Member
Xiaoming Zhang Board Member
Natalie Christo Board President
Virginia Wang Board Member
Fanping Chen Board Member
Vera Lai Treasurer
Dong Sun Board Member
Jane Wei Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stephen Kaplin Board Member 10.0% of Rev
Kuang Yu Fong Board Member 8.9% of Rev
David Sterling Board Member
Junling Wang Board Member
Xiaoming Zhang Board Member
Natalie Lin Board President
Virginia Wang Board Member
Fanping Chen Board Member
Andrew Shiue Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kuang Yu Fong Board Member 6.3% of Rev
Steven Kaplin Board Member 5.9% of Rev
David Sterling Chairman
Xiaoming Zhang Board Member
Natalie Lin Board Member
Jean Huang Board Member
Fan Pen Chen Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (10 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.