Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 5.8% 44 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 7.1% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 9.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 9.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 10.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 10.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 10.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 15.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 14.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 14.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 8.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 9.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 8.2% 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIERAN JOHNSON Executive Dir. 5.8% of Rev
Paul Biedermann Board Member —
Eileen Kathryn Boyd Board Member —
Katerina I Duarte Board Member —
Marc Franchi Board Member —
Andrea M Gordon Board Member —
John Henry Board Member —
Ahmad Khan Board Member —
Tonia Wortman Board Member —
Dr Nichelle Rivers Board Member —
Kenneth Britt Board President —
Kit Sullivan Board President —
Joshua Kreitzman Treasurer —
Jose Tutiven Secretary —
Kasmira Mohanty Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marc Courtade Executive Director 6.2% of Rev
Paul Biedermann Board Member —
Kenneth Britt Esq Board President —
Marc Franchi Secretary —
Joshua Kreitzman Treasurer —
Eileen Kathryn Boyd Board Member —
Katerina I Duarte Esq Board Member —
Andrea M Gordon Board Member —
John Henry Board Member —
Ahmad Khan Board Member —
Paul Lipsky Board Member —
Kasmira Mohanty Board Member —
Kit Sullivan Board President —
Jose Tutiven Board Member —
Toni Wortman Board Member —
Kieran Johnson Executive Dir. —
Dr Kay Hutchins-Sato Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marc Courtade Executive Dir. 6.5% of Rev
Eileen Kathryn Boyd Board Member —
Marc Franchi Secretary —
Beth Levinthal Board President —
Arlene Haims Board Member —
Joshua Kreitzman Treasurer —
Rita Bender Board Member —
Kevin J O'Connell Board Member —
Paul Biedermann Board Member —
Kenneth Britt Board Member —
Andrea M Gordon Board Member —
Robin Gordon Board Member —
Angela Rogen Board Member —
Toni Wortman Board Member —
Dr Kay Hutchins-Sato Board President —
Paul Lipsky Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 806 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 46 points below the peer median (25 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 44 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.