Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 5.8% 44 Fragile Recovery
2022 7.1% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 9.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 9.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 10.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 10.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 10.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 15.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 14.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 14.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 8.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 9.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 8.2% 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIERAN JOHNSON Executive Dir. 5.8% of Rev
Paul Biedermann Board Member
Eileen Kathryn Boyd Board Member
Katerina I Duarte Board Member
Marc Franchi Board Member
Andrea M Gordon Board Member
John Henry Board Member
Ahmad Khan Board Member
Tonia Wortman Board Member
Dr Nichelle Rivers Board Member
Kenneth Britt Board President
Kit Sullivan Board President
Joshua Kreitzman Treasurer
Jose Tutiven Secretary
Kasmira Mohanty Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marc Courtade Executive Director 6.2% of Rev
Paul Biedermann Board Member
Kenneth Britt Esq Board President
Marc Franchi Secretary
Joshua Kreitzman Treasurer
Eileen Kathryn Boyd Board Member
Katerina I Duarte Esq Board Member
Andrea M Gordon Board Member
John Henry Board Member
Ahmad Khan Board Member
Paul Lipsky Board Member
Kasmira Mohanty Board Member
Kit Sullivan Board President
Jose Tutiven Board Member
Toni Wortman Board Member
Kieran Johnson Executive Dir.
Dr Kay Hutchins-Sato Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marc Courtade Executive Dir. 6.5% of Rev
Eileen Kathryn Boyd Board Member
Marc Franchi Secretary
Beth Levinthal Board President
Arlene Haims Board Member
Joshua Kreitzman Treasurer
Rita Bender Board Member
Kevin J O'Connell Board Member
Paul Biedermann Board Member
Kenneth Britt Board Member
Andrea M Gordon Board Member
Robin Gordon Board Member
Angela Rogen Board Member
Toni Wortman Board Member
Dr Kay Hutchins-Sato Board President
Paul Lipsky Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 44 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.