Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 14.6% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 11.4% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 12.8% 56 Fragile Recovery
2020 15.5% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 8.9% 52 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 11.0% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 9.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 1.7% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 9.3% 48 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 10.8% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 8.8% 52 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 18.8% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 12.7% 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH ABRUZZI Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
JOSHUA RUFF Executive Director 5.3% of Rev
LAURIE CURIALE Treasurer 3.3% of Rev
THOMAS M SULLIVAN CHAIRMAN
BARBARA H GOTTFRIED Secretary
THERESA KELLY Treasurer
SANDI BREWSTER-WALKER Board Member
MICHAEL A BUTLER Board Member
MARK M CHAMBERS PHD Board Member
RAFFAELA FERRO Board Member
CATHLEEN HANSEN Board Member
RON HOFFMAN Board Member
ELIZABETH KAHN KAPLAN Board Member
MICHAEL PERCENT Board Member
DOUGLAS REINA Board Member
SCOTT SANDERS Board Member
KRISTEN SIMMONS Board Member
SUE KIESEL WAGNER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NEIL WATSON Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
SARAH ABRUZZI Board Member 4.2% of Rev
LAURIE CURIALE Treasurer 3.1% of Rev
THOMAS M SULLIVAN CHAIRMAN
BARBARA H GOTTFRIED Secretary
THERESA KELLY Treasurer
ELIZABETH M ATWOOD Board Member
DAVID M BAGATTA ESQ Board Member
PETER A FERENTINOS Board Member
RAFFAELA FERRO Board Member
CATHLEEN HANSEN Board Member
ELIZABETH KAHN KAPLAN Board Member
MARK M CHAMBERS PHD Board Member
RON HOFFMAN Board Member
DOUGLAS REINA Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NEIL WATSON Executive Director 6.5% of Rev
KAREN LAVERY Treasurer 3.2% of Rev
LAURIE CURIALE Treasurer 1.2% of Rev
LINDA U MARGOLIN ESQ Board President
BARBARA H GOTTFRIED Secretary
THOMAS M SULLIVAN Treasurer
DANIEL M BAGATTA ESQ Board Member
PETER A FERENTINOS Board Member
RAFFAELA FERRO Board Member
CATHLEEN HANSEN Board Member
MICHAEL P LOCORRIERE Board Member
FILOMENA LOMBARDI Board Member
ELIZABETH KAHN KAPLAN Board Member
ELIZABETH ATWOOD Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NEIL WATSON Executive Director 6.0% of Rev
KAREN LAVERY Treasurer 3.7% of Rev
LINDA U MARGOLIN ESQ Board President
BARBARA H GOTTFRIED Secretary
JAMES J CARPENTER Treasurer
DANIEL M BAGATTA ESQ Board Member
PETER A FERENTINOS Board Member
RAFFAELA FERRO Board Member
AARON W GODFREY Board Member
CATHLEEN HANSEN Board Member
MICHAEL P LOCORRIERE Board Member
FILOMENA LOMBARDI Board Member
THOMAS M SULLIVAN Board Member
ELIZABETH KAHN KAPLAN Board Member
ELIZABETH ATWOOD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 38 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (60 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.