Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 9.9% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 9.4% 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 25.6% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 17.6% 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 7.1% 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 12.0% 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 27.4% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 27.1% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 11.4% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 9.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 12.6% 43 Fragile Recovery
2011 206.8% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member Hidden
PETER J HACKETT Board Member
MARK ROBERTSON Board Member
JOHN LANDESS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member Hidden
PETER J HACKETT Board Member
MARK ROBERTSON Board Member
JOHN LANDESS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member Hidden
PETER J HACKETT Board Member
MARK ROBERTSON Board Member
JOHN LANDESS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in OH for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.