Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
42
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 5.1% 42 Fragile Recovery
2022 3.8% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 7.8% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 9.9% 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 15.6% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 13.7% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 9.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 19.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 17.4% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 15.6% 41 Fragile Recovery
2013 13.3% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 16.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HOPE CHAVEZ EXECUTIVE DI Hidden
WINTER MARSHALL OPERATIONS D Hidden
MAGALY CAJIGAS Board President
SHAMAIN MCALLISTER Board President
KATHARINE HSU HAGMANN Secretary
RAYAN SAAD TREASRURER
PATRICIA BRETT Board Member
ELAINE CARROLL Board Member
JOEL DODSON Board Member
ANESSAH LANGLEY Board Member
BABZ RAWLS IVY Board Member
ANALIS QUINTMAN Board Member
MILA VOLPE Board Member
JEFFREY L MORENO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIEL FITZMAURICE Executive Director Hidden
MARK POTOCSNY Board Member
WOJTEK BOROWSKI Board President
ELAINE CARROLL Board Member
DAISY ABREU Board Member
ANGELA ROBINSON Board Member
RICK WIES Board Member
GREG MARAZITA Treasurer
DARICE GALL Board Member
BABZ RAWLS IVY Board President
LYN CHAMBERLIN Board Member
NICO WHEADON Board Member
KATHERINE HSU HAGMANN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIEL FITZMAURICE Executive Director Hidden
MARK POTOCSNY Board Member
WOJTEK BOROWSKI Board President
ELAINE CARROLL Board Member
DAISY ABREU Board President
ANGELA ROBINSON Board Member
RICK WIES Board Member
GREG MARAZITA Treasurer
RACHEL MELE Secretary
DARICE GALL Board Member
BABZ RAWLS IVY Board Member
LYN CHAMBERLIN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIEL FITZMAURICE Executive Director Hidden
MARK POTOCSNY Secretary
WOJTEK BOROWSKI Board President
ELAINE CARROLL Board Member
DAISY ABREU Board President
ANGELA ROBINSON Board Member
FRANK MITCHELL Board Member
RICK WIES Board Member
JAMES GREGG Board Member
GREG MARAZITA Treasurer
RACHEL MELE Board Member
DARICE GALL Board Member
GENEVIVE WALKER Board Member
BABZ RAWLS IVY Board Member
CAROLINE SMITH Board Member
MICHAEL KELLEHER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 17 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.