Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 39 Fragile Recovery
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 27.6% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 28.3% 36 Fragile Recovery
2016 31.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 29.4% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LALITHA SHIVASWAMY Board President
SUSAN ADAMS Vice President
STEWART BATTLE Board Member
EDWIN BELOW Board Member
JOAN HULTQUIST Board Member
CHARLES CHAMBERLAIN Vice President
SAYOKO DAVENPORT Vice President
FRED BAKER Vice President
DAWN HANEY BAUER SPEC EVENTS
RICHARD WILSON Board Member
ELIZABETH FLYNN Board Member
SUSAN R GOLD Board Member
JOANNE HUELSMAN Board Member
DIANE LINK Vice President
JANET STONE Board Member
RICHARD TECCA Board Member
JERMAINE O WOODARD JR Board Member
JOSEPH CORAY Board Member
SARAH ARMSTRONG EXECUTIVE DI
LEE MCGINVEY Secretary
ADLYN LOEWENTHAL Artistic Director
SUSAN R ORRED Vice President
JOSEPH CAMPOLIETA Board Member
STEPHEN CASILLAS Board Member
EMILY CORNACCHIO Board Member
SCHAUNTICE M SHEPARD Board Member
MACDARA TYNAN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EDWIN BELOW Artistic Director
JOAN HULTQUIST Vice President
CHARLES CHAMBERLAIN Vice President
SAYOKO DAVENPORT Vice President
GREG BENOIT Vice President
STEPHEN COTTLE Board Member
FRED BAKET Board Member
JOSEPH CORAY Board Member
DAWN HANEY BAUER Board Member
RICK WILSON Board Member
ELIZABETH FLYNN Board Member
ANDREW GARETTO Board Member
SUSAN R GOLD Board Member
JOANNE HUELSMAN Board Member
ADLYN LOWENTHAL Board Member
DIANE LINK Board Member
JANET STONE Board Member
RICHARD TECCA Board Member
JERMAINE O WOODARD JR Board Member
DOUGLAS PYRKE Board Member
EMILY BADGER EXECUTIVE DI
LALITHA SHIVASWAMY Board President
SUSAN ADAMS Vice President
STEWART BATTLE Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOANNE HUELSMAN Board Member
SUSAN ADAMS Vice President
JANET STONE Board Member
CHARLES CHAMBERLIN Vice President
EDWIN BELOW Artistic Director
GREG BENOIT Vice President
JOAN HULTQUIST Vice President
STEWART BATTLE Secretary
DAWN HANEY BAUER Board Member
KRISTEN FALLON Board Member
ANDREW GARRETTO Board Member
SUSAN R GOLD Board Member
EVAN LAMBERT Board Member
LAUREN LAMBERT Board Member
LALITHA SHIVASWAMY Board President
RICHARD TECCA Board Member
JERMAINE WOODARD JR Board Member
FRED BAKER Board Member
VALERIE HILL-BAKER Board Member
ANDREW FRITSCH Vice President
BETH FLYNN Board Member
DIANE LINK Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 130 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.