Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2023 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 13.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 14.9% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER BELL Treasurer
LOUIS BROUDY Board President
LIBBY MUCCI Board Member
RICHARD BEYMAN Board Member
LAWRENCE CAVANAGH Board Member
VANESSA MOREST SMITH Board Member
MARY PETRO NOONAN VICE PRESDENT
GREGORY PAYNE Board Member
WALLACE DAVIS Board Member
Gunnar Sahlin Board Member
Jennifer Mirsky Board Member
Priscilla Woyke Board Member
GEORGIA VON SCHMIDT Board Member
douglas adams PRESDENT
charles johnson Board Member
Wendy Gerbier Board Member
Douglas Kerridge Board Member
Peter Hohmeister Board Member
JOHN BRADY III Board Member
KENNETH KUO Board Member
HEATHER DRUGGE Board Member
PASQUALE RAZZANO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER BELL Board President
LOUIS BROUDY Board President
LIBBY MUCCI Secretary
RICHARD BEYMAN Board Member
LAWRENCE CAVANAGH Board Member
VANESSA MOREST Board Member
MARY PETRO NOONAN Board Member
GREGORY PAYNE Board Member
WALLACE DAVIS Board Member
ERIC FREEMAN Treasurer
Jennifer Mirsky Board Member
CAROLE MAXWELL Board Member
EVA TOFT Board Member
GEORGIA VON SCHMIDT Board Member
douglas adams Board Member
charles johnson Board President
Wendy Gerbier Board Member
Douglas Kerridge Board Member
Peter Hohmeister Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER BELL Board President
LOUIS BROUDY Board President
LIBBY MUCCI Secretary
RICHARD BEYMAN Board Member
LAWRENCE CAVANAGH Board Member
VANESSA MOREST Board Member
MARY PETRO NOONAN Board Member
GREGORY PAYNE Board Member
WALLACE DAVIS Board Member
ERIC FREEMAN Treasurer
WARREN SHAPIRO Board Member
CAROLE MAXWELL Board Member
EVA TOFT Board Member
GEORGIA VON SCHMIDT Board Member
douglas adams Board Member
charles johnson Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 130 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points below the peer median (5 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.