Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dominique Dorion Treasurer
Claudette Marquis Secretary
Walter Rathbun Board Member
Jeannine Auger Board Member
Angela Rondeau Board Member
Ann Jalette Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dominique Dorion Treasurer
Claudette Marquis Secretary
Walter Rathbun Board Member
Jeannine Auger Board Member
Angela Rondeau Board Member
Ann Jalette Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in RI for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.