Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 43 Fragile Recovery
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 43 Fragile Recovery
2011 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mary Cay Andrikidis Board President
Neville Crabbe Treasurer
Tina Giachello Board Member
Beth Grams Haxby Board Member
Mary Morris Board Member
John McDermott Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mary Cay Andrikidis Board President
Claudia Van der Heuvel Treasurer
Neville Crabbe Treasurer
Tina Giachello Board Member
Beth Grams Haxby Board Member
Mary Morris Board Member
John McDermott Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points above the peer median (80 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 51 over 5 years (improving by 18 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.