Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 23.4% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 19.2% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 16.6% 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 36.5% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 24.3% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 14.1% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 15.0% 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 21.2% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 23.3% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 24.6% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAN STEENBRUGGE Board President
JOHN OLIVER Board President
DEBRA MINARD Treasurer
KIMBERLY BISHOP Board Member
CHARLES KAWADA Board Member
MATTHEW MCKENNA Board Member
MICHAEL CIRAMI Board Member
MEGHAN TITZER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHARLES KAWADA Board Member
KIMBERLY BISHOP Board Member
DEBRA MINARD Treasurer
MICHAEL CIRAMI Board Member
JAN STEENBRUGGE Board President
JOHN OLIVER Board President
MEGHAN TITZER Board Member
MATTHEW MCKENNA Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHARLES KAWADA Board Member
KIMBERLY BISHOP Board Member
DEBRA MINARD Treasurer
MICHAEL CIRAMI Board Member
JAN STEENBRUGGE Board President
JOHN OLIVER Board President
JACK SIEGEL Board Member
MEGHAN TITZER Board Member
NANCY HAYES Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 8 points above the peer median (50 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 43 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 23.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.