Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 45 Fragile Recovery
2023 41 Fragile Recovery
2022 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RENE ROSEN Board President
SANDRA SHEA Secretary
DAN FOLEY Treasurer
DANIEL SANICOLA VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINA CACIOPPO Board President
JENNIFER KOLLER VICE PRESIDE
TRACEY EDWARDS Treasurer
ELVIRA NGO Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINA CACIOPPO VICE PRESIDE
JENNIFER KOLLER Board President
AMY BOSSETT Treasurer
BETH MONCHER VICE PRESIDE
TRACEY EDWARDS Secretary
TRACY FORGOSH Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINA CACIOPPO VICE PRESIDE
JENNIFER KOLLER Board President
AMY BOSSETT Treasurer
BETH MONCHER VICE PRESIDE
TRACEY EDWARDS Secretary
TRACY FORGOSH Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 176 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points above the peer median (65 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.