Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
18
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
0
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILMAYER MARCELIN Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILMAYER MARCELIN Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILMAYER MARCELIN Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
18 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points below the peer median (0 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 19 → 18 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.