Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 8.1% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 6.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 9.9% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 9.5% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 8.8% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 9.0% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 4.2% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 5.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 19.3% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXANDRA KENNEDY END 11212023 Executive Director Hidden
REBECCA GOGGINS Board Member Hidden
ANDREA POWERS Treasurer Hidden
ELLEN J KEITER Artistic Director Hidden
COURTNEY M WARING Board Member Hidden
JENNIFER SCHANTZ START 09182023 Executive Director Hidden
BRYAN COLLIER Board Member —
ANDREA DAVIS PINKNEY Secretary —
GRACE LIN Board Member —
GABE WOLOSKY Board Member —
THERESA TORO Board Member —
WALESKA SANTIAGO-CENTENO Board Member —
NANCY SOKOLOVE Board Member —
LYNN WAGGONER Treasurer —
JOANNA CAREY Board Member —
LEONARD MARCUS Board Member —
TRACI TODD Board Member —
RAMSEY NAITO Board Member —
WILLIAM PHILLIP GORTH Board President —
DR CLAUDETTE S MCLINN Board President —
EMILY LAIRD DRESSER Board Member —
HUN OHM ESQ Board Member —
SUZANNE MURPHY Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXANDRA KENNEDY Executive Director Hidden
BRYAN COLLIER Board Member —
ANDREA DAVIS PINKNEY Board Member —
GRACE LIN Board Member —
STEVEN MALK Board Member —
CHRIS MILNE Board President —
JEN LOJA Treasurer —
SUZANNE MURPHY Board Member —
H NICHOLAS B CLARK Board Member —
LYNN WAGGONER Board Member —
JANE BAYARD CURLEY Board Member —
LEONARD MARCUS Board Member —
TRACI TODD Board Member —
RAMSEY NAITO Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXANDRA KENNEDY Executive Director Hidden
ALEXANDRA KENNEDY Executive Director Hidden
BRYAN COLLIER Board Member —
WILLIAM PHILLIP GORTH Secretary —
CHRIS LOKER Board President —
ANDREA DAVIS PINKNEY Board Member —
GRACE LIN Board Member —
STEVEN MALK Board Member —
CHRIS MILNE Board President —
JEN LOJA Treasurer —
SUZANNE MURPHY Board Member —
H NICHOLAS B CLARK Board Member —
ROBERT L FORBES Board Member —
JOHN MENDELSON Board Member —
LYNN WAGGONER Board Member —
BRYAN COLLIER Board Member —
WILLIAM PHILLIP GORTH Secretary —
CHRIS LOKER Board President —
ANDREA DAVIS PINKNEY Board Member —
GRACE LIN Board Member —
STEVEN MALK Board Member —
CHRIS MILNE Board President —
JEN LOJA Treasurer —
SUZANNE MURPHY Board Member —
H NICHOLAS B CLARK Board Member —
ROBERT L FORBES Board Member —
LYNN WAGGONER Board Member —
JANE BAYARD CURLEY Board Member —
LEONARD MARCUS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 106 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (40 vs. 77).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.