Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 7.9% 52 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 11.0% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 9.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 2.4% 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 9.2% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 7.6% 42 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 38 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2010 — — 11.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRISTINA BURWELL Executive Director Hidden
STAR LANCASTER Board Member —
PAM SMITH Board Member —
SUSAN KNAUER Board Member —
OLIVIA KELLEY Board Member —
KIM COBURN Board President —
AMY KASER Treasurer —
DONALD BAILEY Board Member —
ELISABETH COLBATH Board Member —
BILL PASSMAN Board Member —
KEVIN MCKENNA Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRISTINA BURWELL Executive Director Hidden
KIM COBURN Board President —
STEVE POLTORZYCKI Board President —
AMY KASER Treasurer —
CHRISTINE NOAH Secretary —
DONALD BAILEY Board Member —
GREIG GREENWALD Board Member —
HUA DONG Board Member —
PAUL CZECH Board Member —
STAR LANCASTER Board Member —
TED SZOSTKOWSKI Board Member —
PAM SMITH Board Member —
SUSAN KNAUER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRISTINA BURWELL Executive Director Hidden
GREIG GREENWALD Board Member —
AMY KASER Treasurer —
DONALD BAILEY Board Member —
STAR LANCASTER Board Member —
STEVE POLTORZYCKI Board President —
KIM COBURN Board President —
TED SZOSTKOWSKI Board Member —
HUA DONG Board Member —
CHRISTINE NOAH Secretary —
ERIN SANDLER-RATHE Board Member —
CAMERON PURDY Secretary —
LISA EMSBO-MATTINGLY Board Member —
COLIN MASSON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRISTINA BURWELL Executive Director Hidden
GREIG GREENWALD Board President —
CAMERON PURDY Secretary —
AMY KASER Treasurer —
TANYA GISOLFIESQ Secretary —
DONALD BAILEY Board Member —
LISA EMSBO-MATTINGLY Board Member —
STAR LANCASTER Board Member —
COLIN MASSON Board Member —
STEVE POLTORZYCKI Board Member —
KIM COBURN Board President —
TED FINCH Board Member —
HARRIET VITTO Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRISTINA BURWELL Executive Director Hidden
KIM COBURN Board Member —
TED FINCH Board Member —
MELANIE THOMPSON Board Member —
KYLE YORK Treasurer —
GREIG GREENWALD Board President —
CAMERON PURDY Board President —
AMY KASER Treasurer —
TANYA GISOLFIESQ Secretary —
DONALD BAILEY Board Member —
LISA EMSBO-MATTINGLY Board Member —
STAR LANCASTER Board Member —
COLIN MASSON Board Member —
STEVE POLTORZYCKI Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 106 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points below the peer median (45 vs. 77).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.